Re: extend pgbench expressions with functions - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: extend pgbench expressions with functions
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoYQAANGAm27JYHSaHgTJqdS-nRwmGkqX4XykwH3uGtKWg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: extend pgbench expressions with functions  (Fabien COELHO <coelho@cri.ensmp.fr>)
Responses Re: extend pgbench expressions with functions
List pgsql-hackers
On Sun, Mar 27, 2016 at 5:01 AM, Fabien COELHO <coelho@cri.ensmp.fr> wrote:
> v40 is yet another rebase.

Thanks.  Committed after removing an unnecessary parameter from the
coerceToXXX() functions.

I guess the question here is whether we want the part-c patch, which
removes the historical \setrandom syntax.  That's technically no
longer needed since we now can use random() as a function directly
inside \set commands, but we might want it anyway for backward
compatibility.

Anybody have an opinion on that?

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Kouhei Kaigai
Date:
Subject: Re: WIP: Upper planner pathification
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Typo in comment