Re: [PATCH] Skip ALTER x SET SCHEMA if the schema didn't change - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: [PATCH] Skip ALTER x SET SCHEMA if the schema didn't change
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoYPKu9a+9j4r_pPCVTwFC=hUkdPz8124YS5jfSe1u2wXQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCH] Skip ALTER x SET SCHEMA if the schema didn't change  (Haribabu Kommi <kommi.haribabu@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [PATCH] Skip ALTER x SET SCHEMA if the schema didn't change  ("David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 6:20 AM, Haribabu Kommi <kommi.haribabu@gmail.com> wrote:
> I went through the patch, following are my observations,
>
> Patch applied with hunks and compiled with out warnings.
> Basic tests are passed.

I'm interested in hearing opinions from multiple people about the
following two questions:

1. Is the new behavior better than the old behavior?
2. Will breaking backward compatibility make too many people unhappy?

My guess is that the answer to the first question is "yes" and that
the answer to the second one is "no", but this is clearly a
significant incompatibility, so I'd like to hear some more opinions
before concluding that we definitely want to do this.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Josh Berkus
Date:
Subject: Beta2 Next week
Next
From: Pavel Stehule
Date:
Subject: Re: Note about comparation PL/SQL packages and our schema/extensions