On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 7:17 AM, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 1:14 PM, Michael Paquier
> <michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 2:06 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Sat, Aug 16, 2014 at 10:27 AM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> > I think ideally it would have been better if we could have logged
>>> > replication commands under separate log_level, but as still there
>>> > is no consensus on extending log_statement and nobody is even
>>> > willing to pursue, it seems okay to go ahead and log these under
>>> > 'all' level.
>>>
>>> I think the consensus is clearly for a separate GUC.
>>
>> +1.
>
> Okay. Attached is the updated version of the patch which I posted before.
> This patch follows the consensus and adds separate parameter
> "log_replication_command".
Looks fine to me.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
