On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 12:34 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
>> rhaas=# alter extension pg_stat_statements drop type pg_stat_statements[];
>> ERROR: syntax error at or near "["
>> LINE 1: ...extension pg_stat_statements drop type pg_stat_statements[];
>> ^
>
>> Hmm. So just how do I do this?
>
> "alter extension pg_stat_statements drop type _pg_stat_statements",
> probably.
*tests*
Yeah, that works. But it seems undesirable for people writing upgrade
scripts to need to count on the way we generate internal type names
for array types.
But there's a bigger problem: it seems to me that we have an
inconsistency between what happens when you create an extension from
scratch and when you upgrade it from unpackaged. Both pg_buffercache
and pg_stat_statements just do this in the "upgrade from unpackaged"
case:
ALTER EXTENSION <ext-name> ADD view <view-name>;
They do *not* add the type and the array type. But when the "1.0"
script is run, the type and array type end up belonging to the
extension. This seems bad.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
