Re: Early WIP/PoC for inlining CTEs - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: Early WIP/PoC for inlining CTEs
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoYH0kw2EEY5eR9qwk0x94p_=y3PouSuG+BddaLSKWejjw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Early WIP/PoC for inlining CTEs  (Andrew Gierth <andrew@tao11.riddles.org.uk>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Sun, Jan 27, 2019 at 8:23 AM Andrew Gierth
<andrew@tao11.riddles.org.uk> wrote:
> I think it makes more sense to say
> that we never inline if MATERIALIZED is specified, that we always inline
> if NOT MATERIALIZED is specified, and that if neither is specified the
> planner will choose (but perhaps note that currently it always chooses
> only based on refcount).

I, too, like this approach.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Early WIP/PoC for inlining CTEs
Next
From: John Naylor
Date:
Subject: Re: WIP: Avoid creation of the free space map for small tables