Re: Parallel Seq Scan vs kernel read ahead - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: Parallel Seq Scan vs kernel read ahead
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoYG-u4WTB1XV6cSei-s2Jdde13d2yUtbenLH66eMAPYcw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Parallel Seq Scan vs kernel read ahead  (David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Parallel Seq Scan vs kernel read ahead
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 6:15 AM David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com> wrote:
> With a 32TB relation, the code will make the chunk size 16GB.  Perhaps
> I should change the code to cap that at 1GB.

It seems pretty hard to believe there's any significant advantage to a
chunk size >1GB, so I would be in favor of that change.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [Patch] ALTER SYSTEM READ ONLY
Next
From: Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais
Date:
Subject: Re: [patch] demote