Re: [9.4 CF 1] And then there were 5 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: [9.4 CF 1] And then there were 5
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoYBRKjTV52RafDZSGfy2u_0rOaLsvEYgAzj_b4kMWQ11A@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [9.4 CF 1] And then there were 5  (Greg Smith <greg@2ndQuadrant.com>)
Responses Re: [9.4 CF 1] And then there were 5
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 12:04 AM, Greg Smith <greg@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> A further look at recently ALTER OPERATOR FAMILY changes shows that Robert
> has been working on those quite a bit.  I'm putting him down as the
> committer on this last one.

I missed that one, now committed.  But just BTW, you kind of messed up
that CommitFest entry.  The link you added as a new version of the
patch was actually to a different patch from the same flock.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_upgrade across more than two neighboring major releases
Next
From: Greg Stark
Date:
Subject: Re: Suggestion for concurrent index creation using a single full scan operation