Re: [9.4 CF 1] And then there were 5 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Greg Smith
Subject Re: [9.4 CF 1] And then there were 5
Date
Msg-id 51EE00DA.2000809@2ndQuadrant.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [9.4 CF 1] And then there were 5  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [9.4 CF 1] And then there were 5
Re: [9.4 CF 1] And then there were 5
List pgsql-hackers
On 7/22/13 10:48 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Greg Smith <greg@2ndQuadrant.com> writes:
>> Remove unused targets from plan:  Alvaro?  (He reviewed it already)
>
> Really I should do that one, but it seems like all my available cycles
> have been going into bug fixing lately :-(

I just put you down as the committer on it, given Alvaro waved that way too.

A further look at recently ALTER OPERATOR FAMILY changes shows that 
Robert has been working on those quite a bit.  I'm putting him down as 
the committer on this last one.

If the CF drags on a bit due to committer time being spent on bugs, 
given the date here I think that's OK.  I would put next week as a loose 
target for finishing these off.  I worry a lot less about committers 
keeping to their schedules than when there are 50 regular contributors 
still moving around.

That leaves only 1 patch where I have no idea who will commit it:
  access to calls stack from GET DIAGNOSTICS statement

-- 
Greg Smith   2ndQuadrant US    greg@2ndQuadrant.com   Baltimore, MD
PostgreSQL Training, Services, and 24x7 Support www.2ndQuadrant.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Pavel Stehule
Date:
Subject: Re: proposal - psql - show longest tables
Next
From: Pavel Stehule
Date:
Subject: Re: proposal - psql - show longest tables