On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 8:49 AM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 05:46:42PM -0500, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> Finally, the fact that a configuration change is in progress is
>> privileged information. Unprivileged users can deduct from the presence
>> of this message that administrators are doing something, and possibly
>> that they have done something wrong.
>>
>> I think it's fine to log a message in the server log if the pg_hba.conf
>> file needs reloading. But the client shouldn't know about this at all.
>
> Should we do this for postgresql.conf too?
It doesn't really make sense; or at least, the exact same thing
doesn't make any sense. If an authentication attempt fails
unexpectedly, it might be because of a pg_hba.conf change that wasn't
reloaded, so it makes sense to try to tip off the DBA. But it can't
really be because of a pending postgresql.conf change that hasn't been
reloaded, because those don't generally affect authentication.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
