On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 9:06 AM, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> On 12 September 2017 at 13:11, Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> wrote:
>> If they really wanted to contrast 'open source commitment' between the
>> various vendors, they probably should have considered including the
>> company that actually commits the most code to PG too, but that's
>> starting to show my own bias.
>
> It certainly would be very generous of you to mention 2ndQuadrant, thank you.
Nope. At the moment, the company that commits the most code to
PostgreSQL is whoever is of course Crunchy, because they employ Tom
Lane. (I assume that's why Stephen is bringing the topic up.)
EnterpriseDB is second, because they employ me. 2ndQuadrant is third.
This is true whether you total by primary author or by who actually
committed the code.
http://rhaas.blogspot.com/2017/04/who-contributes-to-postgresql.html
https://www.reddit.com/r/PostgreSQL/comments/67uk65/who_contributes_to_postgresql_development/dgtxnt6/
Granted, those statistics are only for 2016. I'm sure it's been
different in years past and will be again in the future, but I'll bet
the top company has rarely been anything other than Tom Lane's current
employer.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
--
Sent via pgsql-advocacy mailing list (pgsql-advocacy@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-advocacy
