But this story is not about PostgreSQL. This is about MariaDB. Their choise is what supports their story. Had they made a better story with another company that supports PostgreSQL, they would have chosen it. This has nothing to do with PostgreSQL or companies related to it. Also, this is not about what a company has committed to pg. This is what they (MariaDB) tell from their side that they can make people believe.
Rgs,
Jussi
On Tue, 12/09/2017 23:17, "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com> wrote:
On 09/12/2017 06:06 AM, Simon Riggs wrote:
> On 12 September 2017 at 13:11, Stephen Frost
<sfrost@snowman.net> wrote:
>
>> If they really wanted to contrast 'open source commitment' between the
>> various vendors, they probably should have considered including the
>> company that actually commits the most code to PG too, but that's
>> starting to show my own bias.
>
> It certainly would be very generous of you to mention 2ndQuadrant, thank you.
Regardless of company, code contribution is only a single metric among
an entire vat of grease that lubricates the wheel that turns this community.
JD
--
Command Prompt, Inc. || http://the.postgres.company/ || @cmdpromptinc
PostgreSQL Centered full stack support, consulting and development.
Advocate: @amplifypostgres || Learn: https://pgconf.us
***** Unless otherwise stated, opinions are my own. *****
--
Sent via pgsql-advocacy mailing list (pgsql-advocacy@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-advocacy
