Re: [HACKERS] Declarative partitioning - another take - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Declarative partitioning - another take
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoYB2UOS2+JChDjA=KAEZpkJhffuFdtR+N8MxZdeQia=jQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Declarative partitioning - another take  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Declarative partitioning - another take  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 10:27 AM, Alvaro Herrera
<alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> Even if we decide to keep the message, I think it's not very good
> wording anyhow; as a translator I disliked it on sight.  Instead of
> "skipping scan to validate" I would use "skipping validation scan",
> except that it's not clear what it is we're validating.  Mentioning
> partition constraint in errcontext() doesn't like a great solution, but
> I can't think of anything better.

Maybe something like: partition constraint for table \"%s\" is implied
by existing constraints

> (We have the table_rewrite event trigger, for a very similar use case.)

Hmm, maybe we should see if we can safely support an event trigger here, too.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Ashutosh Sharma
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] pageinspect: Hash index support
Next
From: David Fetter
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_authid.rolpassword format (was Re: [HACKERS] Passwordidentifiers, protocol aging and SCRAM protocol)