Re: Refactoring postmaster's code to cleanup after child exit - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: Refactoring postmaster's code to cleanup after child exit
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoY97LtyT1c+sP7oe11TG9BwaJpnSmnVmueoCigt+3KEeQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Refactoring postmaster's code to cleanup after child exit  (Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Sep 6, 2024 at 9:13 AM Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi> wrote:
> It's currently possible to have up to 2 * max_connections backends in
> the authentication phase. We would have to change that behaviour, or
> make the PGPROC array 2x larger.

I know I already said this elsewhere, but in case it got lost in the
shuffle, +1 for changing this, unless somebody can make a compelling
argument why 2 * max_connections isn't WAY too many.

--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Heikki Linnakangas
Date:
Subject: Re: Refactoring postmaster's code to cleanup after child exit
Next
From: David Rowley
Date:
Subject: Re: Optimize WindowAgg's use of tuplestores