Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: pg_dump versus rules, once again - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: pg_dump versus rules, once again
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoY5FH_EdUom98tqt=CNdmAS2AkM8zRv8Ru-T+diZZpEBQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_dump versus rules, once again  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: pg_dump versus rules, once again  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 10:00 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> The changes in pg_backup_archiver.c would have to be back-patched
> into all versions supporting --if-exists, so that they don't fail
> on dump archives produced by patched versions.

Even if you patch future minor releases, past minor releases are still
going to exist out there in the wild for a long, long time.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_dump versus rules, once again
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Unlogged tables cleanup