Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoY1t42aQwgM8HeW=smg0TyoMYc38j5noZPxh5ddXqiyFw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning  (Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat@enterprisedb.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Feb 7, 2018 at 8:37 AM, Ashutosh Bapat
<ashutosh.bapat@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> While looking at the changes in partition.c I happened to look at the
> changes in try_partition_wise_join(). They mark partitions deemed
> dummy by pruning as dummy relations. If we accept those changes, we
> could very well change the way we handle dummy partitioned tables,
> which would mean that we also revert the recent commit
> f069c91a5793ff6b7884120de748b2005ee7756f. But I guess, those changes
> haven't been reviewed yet and so not final.

Well, if you have an opinion on those proposed changes, I'd like to hear it.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Obsolete fmgr() declaration in fmgr.h
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Why does load_external_function() return PGFunction?