Re: partitioned tables and contrib/sepgsql - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: partitioned tables and contrib/sepgsql
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoY+zN3zq1PuYwXOXpehMJR=wtZes2q=2qpDi4SLwkMa9Q@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: partitioned tables and contrib/sepgsql  (Mike Palmiotto <mike.palmiotto@crunchydata.com>)
Responses Re: partitioned tables and contrib/sepgsql  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Re: partitioned tables and contrib/sepgsql  (Mike Palmiotto <mike.palmiotto@crunchydata.com>)
Re: partitioned tables and contrib/sepgsql  (Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 2:14 PM, Mike Palmiotto
<mike.palmiotto@crunchydata.com> wrote:
> Attached you will find two patches, which were rebased on master as of
> 156d388 (applied with `git am --revert [patch file]`). The first gets
> rid of some pesky compiler warnings and the second implements the
> sepgsql handling of partitioned tables.

0001 has the problem that we have a firm rule against putting any
#includes whatsoever before "postgres.h".  This stdbool issue has come
up before, though, and I fear we're going to need to do something
about it.

0002 looks extremely straightforward, but I wonder if we could get one
of the people on this list who knows about sepgsql to have a look?
(Stephen Frost, Joe Conway, KaiGai Kohei...)

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] SortSupport for macaddr type
Next
From: Petr Jelinek
Date:
Subject: Re: Somebody has not thought through subscription lockingconsiderations