On Wed, 11 Dec 2024 at 14:46, Robert Treat <rob@xzilla.net> wrote:
On Thu, Dec 5, 2024 at 7:25 AM Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org> wrote: > > Hi > > On Thu, 5 Dec 2024 at 03:09, Jeremy Schneider <schneider@ardentperf.com> wrote: >> >> Anyone here know who's taking care of Planet Postgres these days? >> >> I was chatting w James Sewell on slack and he mentioned that he's got a blog sitting unapproved in the queue for a few weeks now and hasn't heard anything back. I thought when I submitted my blog to planet it got approved really fast, so I wonder if his email hit someone's spam folder or someone's on vacation or something like that? > > > Sorry about that - there was some discussion on whether all the posts on the feed were appropriate or not, and it got forgotten whilst we were waiting for some more content to review. It's approved now. > > As a general note to all our bloggers, please filter feeds to ensure that all posts meet the requirements of the policy at https://www.postgresql.org/about/policies/planet-postgresql/. The most common reason we get complaints or that we do not approve feeds (by far) is that they fail the "ad test". In short, if a blog discusses something other than PostgreSQL (and that something is not both related to PostgreSQL and released under an OSI approved licence), if all mentions of the something are removed, is the post still useful? If not, it will fail the ad test. > >
A minor note that the above answer didn't actually answer the OP's question of who maintains the planet postgres stuff. Perhaps it would make sense to add an explicit list of maintainers like we do with the other teams and committees (https://www.postgresql.org/about/governance/) ?
We don't generally share the names of moderators (for anything, not just Planet) as that seems to encourage people to contact individuals directly rather than using the correct channels.
