On Saturday, July 9, 2011, Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume@lelarge.info> wrote:
> I would prefer to only refresh the old parent node, and the new parent
> node. But we have no way to know the new parent node. So I refresh all
> schemas. Which will bring other performance issues for users with big
> schemas.
I wonder if we need to think about a way of passing more info down to
the lower guts of the execution mechanism. We kinda did that already
when we added the 2 part SQL execution, maybe now we should think
about a more extensible technique (maybe as simple as passing a simple
struct of stuff to deal with).
--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
