Re: sinval synchronization considered harmful - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Dave Page
Subject Re: sinval synchronization considered harmful
Date
Msg-id CA+OCxoyOJ82gOVE5v_Dx7o-z505Yj2fZ4BEqCQiPkSQCmkyHxg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: sinval synchronization considered harmful  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: sinval synchronization considered harmful
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 8:15 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I think the real challenge is going to be testing.  If anyone has a
> machine with weak memory ordering they can give me access to, that
> would be really helpful for flushing the bugs out of this stuff.
> Getting it to work on x86 is not the hard part.

I believe there's a PPC box in our storage facility in NJ that we
might be able to dig out for you. There's also a couple in our India
office. Let me know if they'd be of help.

--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake

EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: sinval synchronization considered harmful
Next
From: Yeb Havinga
Date:
Subject: Re: [v9.1] sepgsql - userspace access vector cache