Re: Enums printout - possible bug - Mailing list pgadmin-hackers

-- 

Harshal Dhumal

Sr. Software Engineer

EnterpriseDB India: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 3:13 PM, Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org> wrote:

Hi

Looks like there's a TZ issue in the datatype test:

======================================================================

FAIL: runTest (pgadmin.feature_tests.pg_datatype_validation_test.PGDataypeFeatureTest)

Test checks for PG data-types output

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Traceback (most recent call last):

  File "/Users/dpage/git/pgadmin4/web/pgadmin/feature_tests/pg_datatype_validation_test.py", line 105, in runTest

    self._check_datatype()

  File "/Users/dpage/git/pgadmin4/web/pgadmin/feature_tests/pg_datatype_validation_test.py", line 155, in _check_datatype

    batch['output'][cnt - 2]

  File "/Users/dpage/git/pgadmin4/web/pgadmin/feature_tests/pg_datatype_validation_test.py", line 186, in check_result

    datatype, source_code, string_to_find

AssertionError: for datatype tstzrange

["2010-01-01 08:30:00+00","2010-06-01 10:30:00+01") does not match with ["2010-01-01 14:00:00+05:30","2010-06-01 15:00:00+05:30")

Fixed.

Please find attached updated patch.

 

On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 6:34 AM, Harshal Dhumal <harshal.dhumal@enterprisedb.com> wrote:

+pgadmin-hackers

-- 

Harshal Dhumal

Sr. Software Engineer

EnterpriseDB India: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 5:26 PM, Harshal Dhumal <harshal.dhumal@enterprisedb.com> wrote:

Hi,

Please find attached patch for various data type test cases.

-- 

Harshal Dhumal

Sr. Software Engineer

EnterpriseDB India: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 5:24 PM, Harshal Dhumal <harshal.dhumal@enterprisedb.com> wrote:

-- 

Harshal Dhumal

Sr. Software Engineer

EnterpriseDB India: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

On Sat, Dec 9, 2017 at 12:06 PM, Khushboo Vashi <khushboo.vashi@enterprisedb.com> wrote:

On Sat, Dec 9, 2017 at 11:50 AM, Harshal Dhumal <harshal.dhumal@enterprisedb.com> wrote:

On Sat, Dec 9, 2017 at 11:30 AM, Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org> wrote:

Hi

Yeah, that one is in my list to work on. Have you specifically tested it with enum types (not enum[])?

Yes.

 

@Harshal,

 

Can you add multidimensional array, enum types into feature test (pg_datatype_validation_test.py) ?

I think I need to add test cases for all array data types not just enum types since fix was not targeted for any particular data type.

 

 

On Sat, Dec 9, 2017 at 5:55 AM, Harshal Dhumal <harshal.dhumal@enterprisedb.com> wrote:

Hi Dave,

Recently I sent a patch regarding multidimensional array representation issue.

In that patch I have reworked about how multidimensional (1 dimension to n dimension)

array data should be represented in grid.

Also this patch covers almost all the array data types including composite array data types like

int8range[], enum[], inet[], cidr[], macaddr[], uuid[], xml[], bit[], varbit[] and so on.

Please review the patch and let me know if any thing needs to be included in this patch.

Thanks,

-- 

Harshal Dhumal

Sr. Software Engineer

EnterpriseDB India: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

On Sat, Dec 9, 2017 at 10:45 AM, Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org> wrote:

Murtuza, can you investigate please?

Thanks!

On Fri, Dec 8, 2017 at 8:08 PM, Bartosz Dmytrak <bdmytrak@gmail.com> wrote:

Hi all,

According to documentation: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/functions-enum.html when I execute SELECT  enum_range(null::rainbow) then output should look like this: {red,orange,yellow,green,blue,purple}

But in pgAdmin output looks like this: {{,r,e,d,,,o,r,a,n,g,e,,,y,e,l,l,o,w,,,g,r,e,e,n,,,b,l,u,e,,,p,u,r,p,l,e,}}. When you click on the field, popup window shows correct value. I’ve double checked it in psql, and output is correct. I think it could be considered as bug in pgAdmin

 

PgAdmin details:

Version 2.0

Python Version 2.7.13 (v2.7.13:a06454b1afa1, Dec 17 2016, 20:42:59) [MSC v.1500 32 bit (Intel)]

Flask Version 0.12.2

Application Mode Desktop

 

Pg Version: 10.1

Regardless this one, many thanks for your great job pgAdmin Team!

 

 

Best regards,

Bartosz Dmytrak

 

--

Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake

EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

--

Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake

EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

--

Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake

EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company