Re: Code coverage report generation for JS files - Mailing list pgadmin-hackers

From Dave Page
Subject Re: Code coverage report generation for JS files
Date
Msg-id CA+OCxowk1eDRWfYj0MrZvyk0-_OjubHGpCqsFL8bmQDKpykWjg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Code coverage report generation for JS files  (Pramod Ahire <pramod.ahire@enterprisedb.com>)
Responses Re: Code coverage report generation for JS files  (Pramod Ahire <pramod.ahire@enterprisedb.com>)
List pgadmin-hackers
Was a Makefile target added? Maybe "make coverage"...

On Fri, Aug 7, 2020 at 8:10 AM Pramod Ahire <pramod.ahire@enterprisedb.com> wrote:

Thank you :)

 

Pramod Ahire

Software Engineer

 

https://lh4.googleusercontent.com/U1erEuyI_d0xEUA0CrKjwx9aWQ52HNCxc38dMsLP-ZrLgfVNrhsrNobxlmeOdb1kMPtrrxcUwEHZgbGJC4R0qR4r1sBZa_z9R8ihFRaP2Hr_Wnhq6HcIQHe1ZoviDPwUkTdzNcg

 

C: +91-020-66449600/601

D: +91-9028697679

edbpostgres.com

 

 

From: Akshay Joshi <akshay.joshi@enterprisedb.com>
Date: Friday, 7 August 2020 at 12:38 PM
To: Pramod Ahire <pramod.ahire@enterprisedb.com>
Cc: Aditya Toshniwal <aditya.toshniwal@enterprisedb.com>, pgadmin-hackers <pgadmin-hackers@postgresql.org>, Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org>
Subject: Re: Code coverage report generation for JS files

 

Thanks, patch applied.



--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake

EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

Attachment

pgadmin-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Pramod Ahire
Date:
Subject: Re: Code coverage report generation for JS files
Next
From: Dave Page
Date:
Subject: pgAdmin 4 commit: Clarify some of the differences when running in serve