Re: Incorrect domain logic for 9.1 - Mailing list pgadmin-hackers

From Dave Page
Subject Re: Incorrect domain logic for 9.1
Date
Msg-id CA+OCxowgc9zjUrgHuNztBEFdRqBt6=-JBiYHyXW-Qw545ei79g@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Incorrect domain logic for 9.1  (Thom Brown <thom@linux.com>)
Responses Re: Incorrect domain logic for 9.1
List pgadmin-hackers
Hi

I know Guillaume is working on domain support at the moment, so I'm
going to leave it to him to incorporate this change, if he hasn't
already fixed it.

Guillaume; let me know if you want me to treat it independently and
review/commit regardless.

Thanks.

On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 10:21 PM, Thom Brown <thom@linux.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I noticed that if I create a domain based on an array data type, it
> doesn't get listed in the Domains node if the server is 9.1.  This is
> because the query that gets the domains says that if the number of
> dimensions used is greater than 0 (which it will be if it's an array),
> then it must match against the OID shown in typelem.  As of 9.1 that's
> no longer the case as typelem isn't used for domains anymore, although
> I don't see why this was ever used by PgAdmin to get a list of domains
> as it copes fine without this logic since typbasetype always provides
> the necessary info.  Is the constituent base type of the array type
> relevant anywhere in the domains section of PgAdmin?  I can't find any
> place it actually uses it.
>
> The attached patch removes the join logic completely to make it a
> straightforward join.  From what I can tell (testing it against 8.4),
> everything continues to work as usual, and now allows array-based
> domains to be visible for 9.1 instances.
>
> Could someone take a look, and see if there are cases this might
> break?  In any case, a fix is needed.
>
> --
> Thom
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgadmin-hackers mailing list (pgadmin-hackers@postgresql.org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgadmin-hackers
>



--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake

EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

pgadmin-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Dave Page
Date:
Subject: Re: Remaining work for 1.16
Next
From: "pgAdmin Trac"
Date:
Subject: [pgAdmin III] #362: pgScript and ampersand