<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 8:12 PM, Robert Haas <span
dir="ltr"><<ahref="mailto:robertmhaas@gmail.com" target="_blank">robertmhaas@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br
/><blockquoteclass="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div id=":7w5"
style="overflow:hidden">+1,but I'm wondering why we need anything more than just<br /> json_typeof(). Doesn't that
prettymuch cover it?</div></blockquote></div><br /></div><div class="gmail_extra">I agree with Merlin that
json_is_object()is superfluous, since it can just be replaced with json_typeof() = 'object'. Likewise for
json_is_array(). But without json_is_scalar(), the choice is one of these two forms:<br /></div><div
class="gmail_extra"> json_typeof() NOT IN ('object', 'array')<br /></div><div class="gmail_extra"> json_typeof() IN
('string','number', 'boolean', 'null')<br /><br /></div><div class="gmail_extra">And it protects the user against
forgettingabout, say, the 'null' typeof() when constructing their check expression.<br /><br /><br /></div><div
class="gmail_extra">Regards,<br/>Andrew Tipton<br /></div></div>
