Re: adding partitioned tables to publications - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Amit Langote
Subject Re: adding partitioned tables to publications
Date
Msg-id CA+HiwqHE=C2hxUgsvSh06D-2pVnz3T5ozZWyFR8CqkyGX9kJCg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: adding partitioned tables to publications  (Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Apr 8, 2020 at 11:07 PM Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 8, 2020 at 9:21 PM Peter Eisentraut
> <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> > I think this is because the END { } section in PostgresNode.pm shuts
> > down all running instances in immediate mode, which doesn't save
> > coverage properly.
>
> Thanks for that tip.  Appending the following at the end of the test
> file has fixed the coverage reporting for me.

The patch posted in the previous email has it, but I meant this by
"the following":

+
+$node_publisher->stop('fast');
+$node_subscriber1->stop('fast');
+$node_subscriber2->stop('fast');

-- 

Amit Langote
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Juan José Santamaría Flecha
Date:
Subject: Re: PG compilation error with Visual Studio 2015/2017/2019
Next
From: David Steele
Date:
Subject: Re: Online checksums patch - once again