On Sat, Apr 7, 2018 at 11:26 AM, David Rowley
<david.rowley@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> Everything else looks fine from my point of view.
Me too, although I still think having struct names PartitionPruning
and PartitionRelPruning is going to be a bit confusing. We should
think about naming the latter to something else. I suggested
PartitionPruningDispatch(Data), but David doesn't seem to like it.
Maybe, PartitionPruneState, because it parallels the
PartitionPruneInfo that comes from the planner for every partitioned
table in the tree.
Thanks,
Amit
