>> Although, I suspect the (dropped index + enable_seqscan) causes this,
>> is the cost shown in explain output some kind of default max or
>> something like that for such abnormal cases?
>
> When you set enable_xxx=off, it not actually disables the xxx
> operation, it sets the start cost to the high value (10000000000).
>
Oh, okay, thanks!
--
Amit Langote
