Re: Making Bitmapsets be valid Nodes - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Amit Langote
Subject Re: Making Bitmapsets be valid Nodes
Date
Msg-id CA+HiwqGwimkH4bBJHHKqDWOY_MrROiy8_XKiEVMN+OJ1OTb2Rg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Making Bitmapsets be valid Nodes  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Nov 14, 2022 at 12:23 AM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com> writes:
> > On 11.11.22 21:05, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> Attached is a cleaned-up version of Amit's patch v24-0003 at [2].
> >> I fixed the problems with not always tagging Bitmapsets, and changed
> >> the outfuncs/readfuncs logic so that Bitmapsets still print exactly
> >> as they did before (thus, this doesn't require a catversion bump).
>
> > This looks good to me.
>
> Pushed, thanks for looking.

Thanks a lot for this.

I agree that it may not be worthwhile to add an extra function call by
changing COPY_BITMAPSET_FIELD, etc. that is currently emitted by
gen_node_support.pl for any Bitmapset * / Relid struct members to
COPY_NODE_FIELD, etc.

-- 
Thanks, Amit Langote
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: John Naylor
Date:
Subject: Re: Non-decimal integer literals
Next
From: Amit Langote
Date:
Subject: Re: ExecRTCheckPerms() and many prunable partitions