On Sat, Dec 9, 2023 at 2:05 AM Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> wrote:
> On 2023-12-08 Fr 11:37, Robert Haas wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 8, 2023 at 1:59 AM Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> Would it be messy to replace the lookahead approach by whatever's
> >> suiable *in the future* when it becomes necessary to do so?
> > It might be. Changing grammar rules to tends to change corner-case
> > behavior if nothing else. We're best off picking the approach that we
> > think is correct long term.
>
> All this makes me wonder if Alvaro's first suggested solution (adding
> NESTED to the UNBOUNDED precedence level) wouldn't be better after all.
I've done just that in the latest v32.
--
Thanks, Amit Langote
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
