Re: generic plans and "initial" pruning - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Amit Langote
Subject Re: generic plans and "initial" pruning
Date
Msg-id CA+HiwqGoORM+yfm8PhGWfHNUSBbSUgTQC=s5ieV8b4FX1yDBrg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: generic plans and "initial" pruning  (Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: generic plans and "initial" pruning  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>)
Re: generic plans and "initial" pruning  (David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>)
Re: generic plans and "initial" pruning  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Mar 28, 2022 at 4:28 PM Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 28, 2022 at 4:17 PM Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Other than the changes mentioned above, the updated patch now contains
> > a bit more commentary than earlier versions, mostly around
> > AcquireExecutorLocks()'s new way of determining the set of relations
> > to lock and the significantly redesigned working of the "initial"
> > execution pruning.
>
> Forgot to rebase over the latest HEAD, so here's v7.  Also fixed that
> _out and _read functions for PlanInitPruningOutput were using an
> obsolete node label.

Rebased.

-- 
Amit Langote
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Amit Langote
Date:
Subject: Re: ExecRTCheckPerms() and many prunable partitions
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: Removing more vacuumlazy.c special cases, relfrozenxid optimizations