Re: BUG #15779: Partition elimination doesn't work as expected whenusing PARTITION BY RANGE - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Amit Langote
Subject Re: BUG #15779: Partition elimination doesn't work as expected whenusing PARTITION BY RANGE
Date
Msg-id CA+HiwqGYYx3L80Qvtv-4tkeeeq315mjSuKSGqAejswqmwq6YSA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: BUG #15779: Partition elimination doesn't work as expected whenusing PARTITION BY RANGE  (Damir Ciganović-Janković <damir.ciganovic.jankovic@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: BUG #15779: Partition elimination doesn't work as expected whenusing PARTITION BY RANGE  (Damir Ciganović-Janković <damir.ciganovic.jankovic@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-bugs
Hi Damir,

On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 5:32 PM Damir Ciganović-Janković
<damir.ciganovic.jankovic@gmail.com> wrote:
> About those improvements you are mentioning, have you maybe alaready created a task/issue on them? So that I can
trackit and do the upgrade once the version with these improvements goes out 

No, I haven't sent any proposal for that yet.  Maybe you know, but
development is done by sending design proposals and associated patches
to the pgsql-hackers mailing list.  The only way to track what's being
developed is to subscribe to that mailing list and follow discussion
threads of topics that are of interest to you.  You're always welcome
to participate in those discussions if you have ideas, review comments
on the design, patches, etc.

I may propose improvements to the pruning logic when the next
development cycle begins a few months later.  I don't know if I will
remember to reply here to remind you to follow the development.

Thanks,
Amit



pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: Jeff Janes
Date:
Subject: Re: BUG #15784: logical replication replicate data of type array foroperation insert but update/delete/truncate
Next
From: Damir Ciganović-Janković
Date:
Subject: Re: BUG #15779: Partition elimination doesn't work as expected whenusing PARTITION BY RANGE