Re: simplifying foreign key/RI checks - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Amit Langote
Subject Re: simplifying foreign key/RI checks
Date
Msg-id CA+HiwqFPXVSozQBW6LBsW8jek9Z4i4M-aYVEb59CLHjUh5Xtpg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: simplifying foreign key/RI checks  (Corey Huinker <corey.huinker@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: simplifying foreign key/RI checks
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 9:24 AM Corey Huinker <corey.huinker@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 24, 2021 at 6:51 AM Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Here's v5.
>
> v5 patches apply to master.
> Suggested If/then optimization is implemented.
> Suggested case merging is implemented.
> Passes make check and make check-world yet again.
> Just to confirm, we don't free the RI_CompareHashEntry because it points to an entry in a hash table which is
TopMemoryContextaka lifetime of the session, correct?
 

Right.

> Anybody else want to look this patch over before I mark it Ready For Committer?

Would be nice to have others look it over.  Thanks.

-- 
Amit Langote
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bharath Rupireddy
Date:
Subject: Re: Identify missing publications from publisher while create/alter subscription.
Next
From: "tsunakawa.takay@fujitsu.com"
Date:
Subject: RE: libpq debug log