Re: Autovacuum on partitioned table - Mailing list pgsql-hackers
From | Amit Langote |
---|---|
Subject | Re: Autovacuum on partitioned table |
Date | |
Msg-id | CA+HiwqEG+gv5oxuP+Rg4ruYz1u4ab7d_Sbzbb6R0p=ScfoG6qw@mail.gmail.com Whole thread Raw |
In response to | Re: Autovacuum on partitioned table (Masahiko Sawada <masahiko.sawada@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Responses |
Re: Autovacuum on partitioned table
|
List | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 4:47 PM Masahiko Sawada <masahiko.sawada@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > Thank you for updating the patch. I tested v4 patch. > > After analyze or autoanalyze on partitioned table n_live_tup and > n_dead_tup are updated. However, TRUNCATE and VACUUM on the > partitioned table don't change these values until invoking analyze or > autoanalyze whereas in normal tables these values are reset or > changed. For example, with your patch: > > * Before > relname | n_live_tup | n_dead_tup | n_mod_since_analyze > ---------+------------+------------+--------------------- > c1 | 11 | 0 | 0 > c2 | 11 | 0 | 0 > c3 | 11 | 0 | 0 > c4 | 11 | 0 | 0 > c5 | 11 | 0 | 0 > parent | 55 | 0 | 0 > (6 rows) > > * After 'TRUNCATE parent' > relname | n_live_tup | n_dead_tup | n_mod_since_analyze > ---------+------------+------------+--------------------- > c1 | 0 | 0 | 0 > c2 | 0 | 0 | 0 > c3 | 0 | 0 | 0 > c4 | 0 | 0 | 0 > c5 | 0 | 0 | 0 > parent | 55 | 0 | 0 > (6 rows) > > * Before > relname | n_live_tup | n_dead_tup | n_mod_since_analyze > ---------+------------+------------+--------------------- > c1 | 0 | 11 | 0 > c2 | 0 | 11 | 0 > c3 | 0 | 11 | 0 > c4 | 0 | 11 | 0 > c5 | 0 | 11 | 0 > parent | 0 | 55 | 0 > (6 rows) > > * After 'VACUUM parent' > relname | n_live_tup | n_dead_tup | n_mod_since_analyze > ---------+------------+------------+--------------------- > c1 | 0 | 0 | 0 > c2 | 0 | 0 | 0 > c3 | 0 | 0 | 0 > c4 | 0 | 0 | 0 > c5 | 0 | 0 | 0 > parent | 0 | 55 | 0 > (6 rows) > > We can make it work correctly but I think perhaps we can skip updating > statistics values of partitioned tables other than n_mod_since_analyze > as the first step. Because if we support also n_live_tup and > n_dead_tup, user might get confused that other statistics values such > as seq_scan, seq_tup_read however are not supported. +1, that makes sense. Thanks, Amit
pgsql-hackers by date: