Re: ModifyTable overheads in generic plans - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Amit Langote
Subject Re: ModifyTable overheads in generic plans
Date
Msg-id CA+HiwqEETDR_e=1oxWfO5zKkR_xdmGS5nXdoiorSPYYEZVGw0w@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: ModifyTable overheads in generic plans  (Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: ModifyTable overheads in generic plans  (Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Dec 22, 2020 at 5:16 PM Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 7, 2020 at 3:53 PM Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 5:04 PM Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Attached new 0002 which does these adjustments.  I went with
> > > ri_RootTargetDesc to go along with ri_RelationDesc.
> > >
> > > Also, I have updated the original 0002 (now 0003) to make
> > > GetChildToRootMap() use ri_RootTargetDesc instead of
> > > ModifyTableState.rootResultRelInfo.ri_RelationDesc, so that even
> > > AfterTriggerSaveEvent() can now use that function.  This allows us to
> > > avoid having to initialize ri_ChildToRootMap anywhere but inside
> > > GetChildRootMap(), with that long comment defending doing so. :-)
> >
> > These needed to be rebased due to recent copy.c upheavals.  Attached.
>
> Needed to be rebased again.

And again, this time over the recent batch insert API related patches.

-- 
Amit Langote
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Kyotaro Horiguchi
Date:
Subject: Re: Is Recovery actually paused?
Next
From: "tsunakawa.takay@fujitsu.com"
Date:
Subject: RE: Parallel INSERT (INTO ... SELECT ...)