Thanks for sharing this case. I hadn't considered it, but you're right that it should be handled sensibly. I have fixed table sync code to handle this case properly. Could you please check your case with the attached updated patch?
I was checking this today and found that the behavior doesn't change much with the updated patch. The tables are still replicated, just that a select count from parent table shows 0, rest of the partitions including default one has the data from the publisher. I was expecting more like an error at subscriber saying the table type is not same.
Please find the attached file for the test case, in case something is unclear.
