I'll give it a try, the whole setup is synthetic anyway, should not be too much of a trouble
Best regards
Seref
On Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 3:16 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
Seref Arikan <serefarikan@kurumsalteknoloji.com> writes: > Another idea that popped into my head is to consider table partitioning. Am > I correct to assume that (inevitable) joins could benefit from partitions > when sub query criteria constraints results to a particular partition?
That's too vague to answer really. My suspicion is that you'd still end up having to modify the queries, ie hand-factoring the joins, but maybe you wouldn't need to. You could experiment easily enough; just set up a toy database with not much data in it and see if you get plans that don't scan all the partitions.
