On Thu, Feb 08, 2024 at 03:49:03PM +1300, Thomas Munro wrote: > On Thu, Feb 8, 2024 at 3:38 PM Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com> wrote: >> Perhaps you could wrap it in a branch-free sign() function so you get >> a narrow answer? >> >> https://stackoverflow.com/questions/14579920/fast-sign-of-integer-in-c > > Ah, strike that, it is much like the suggested (a > b) - (a < b) but > with extra steps...
movsx rsi, esi movsx rdi, edi xor eax, eax sub rdi, rsi test rdi, rdi setg al shr rdi, 63 sub eax, edi ret
while the approach Andres suggested compiles to
xor eax, eax cmp edi, esi setl dl setg al movzx edx, dl sub eax, edx ret
Here is a patch that fixes existing cases and introduces a macro for this comparison (it uses the (a > b) - (a < b) approach). Not sure where to place the macro nor what a suitable name should be, so feel free to suggest anything.
I also noted that some functions are duplicated and it might be an idea to introduce a few standard functions like pg_qsort_strcmp for, e.g., integers and other common types.
Also noted it is quite common to have this pattern in various places to do lexicographic sort of multiple values and continue the comparison if they are equal. Not sure if that is something we should look at.
