RE: WAL settings - Mailing list pgsql-novice

From J B
Subject RE: WAL settings
Date
Msg-id CA+-SBAUkVSjLg0TSpbFuntL-Y2Nx5w3=oiw85hMWpJxfrHheKA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to RE: WAL settings  (Stephen Froehlich <s.froehlich@cablelabs.com>)
Responses RE: WAL settings  (Stephen Froehlich <s.froehlich@cablelabs.com>)
List pgsql-novice
I was not able to google out the proper log file to look into,ill try it next time,thank you

Dne 14. 2. 2018 10:51 odpoledne napsal uživatel "Stephen Froehlich" <s.froehlich@cablelabs.com>:

10 is the default value, as is wal_level = “replica”.

 

By the way, if you had checked your postgresql-10-main.log after you sent the reload command (always a good idea), it gives exactly this hint as I remember.

 

--Stephen

 

From: J B [mailto:mrjanbernat@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2018 8:10 AM
To: Andreas Kretschmer <andreas@a-kretschmer.de>
Cc: pgsql-novice@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: WAL settings

 

Wow thank you, i checked that this was commented out in 9.4 but with setting = 0, but 10.1 has this commented with = 10 so i assume its default value.

 

2018-02-14 13:50 GMT+01:00 Andreas Kretschmer <andreas@a-kretschmer.de>:



Am 14.02.2018 um 13:33 schrieb J B:

Hello

I have an issue with WAL settings with postgress 10.1 used for zabbix monitoring system. When i change WAL setting to "minimal" the database goes down. We used this setting in version 9.4 to improve performance of our monitoring server so i would like to replicate this setting.


you have to set max_wal_senders to 0.


Regards, Andreas

--
2ndQuadrant - The PostgreSQL Support Company.
www.2ndQuadrant.com

 

pgsql-novice by date:

Previous
From: Stephen Froehlich
Date:
Subject: RE: WAL settings
Next
From: Stephen Froehlich
Date:
Subject: RE: WAL settings