Re: Can I add Index to make a query faster which involves joins onunnest ? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Rob Sargent
Subject Re: Can I add Index to make a query faster which involves joins onunnest ?
Date
Msg-id C9E53793-47D3-4A3F-B795-5DD800508CD7@gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Can I add Index to make a query faster which involves joins on unnest?  (Arup Rakshit <ar@zeit.io>)
Responses Re: Can I add Index to make a query faster which involves joins onunnest ?  (Arup Rakshit <ar@zeit.io>)
List pgsql-general


On Sep 13, 2018, at 12:17 PM, Arup Rakshit <ar@zeit.io> wrote:

The below query basically gives the result by maintaining the order of the sizes in the list.

explain analyze select
        "price_levels"."name",
        "price_levels"."size"
from
        "price_levels"
join unnest(array['M',
        'L',
        'XL',
        '2XL',
        '3XL',
        '4XL',
        '5XL',
        '6XL',
        'S']) with ordinality t(size,
        ord)
                using (size)
order by
        t.size


I have a Btree index on the size column.

Explain output is:

Merge Join  (cost=4.61..5165.38 rows=60000 width=46) (actual time=0.157..57.872 rows=60000 loops=1)
  Merge Cond: ((price_levels.size)::text = t.size)
  ->  Index Scan using price_levels_size_idx on price_levels  (cost=0.29..4111.05 rows=60000 width=14) (actual time=0.044..25.941 rows=60000 loops=1)
  ->  Sort  (cost=4.32..4.57 rows=100 width=32) (actual time=0.108..3.946 rows=53289 loops=1)
        Sort Key: t.size
        Sort Method: quicksort  Memory: 25kB
        ->  Function Scan on unnest t  (cost=0.00..1.00 rows=100 width=32) (actual time=0.030..0.033 rows=9 loops=1)
Planning time: 0.667 ms
Execution time: 62.846 ms



Thanks,

Arup Rakshit


There are not value of size fit it to be a worthwhile key.


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Arup Rakshit
Date:
Subject: Can I add Index to make a query faster which involves joins on unnest?
Next
From: Neto pr
Date:
Subject: Estimate time without running the query