Re: BUG #17212: pg_amcheck fails on checking temporary relations - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Mark Dilger
Subject Re: BUG #17212: pg_amcheck fails on checking temporary relations
Date
Msg-id C5BF66C2-8698-4232-A2CA-7763F7B91F7D@enterprisedb.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: BUG #17212: pg_amcheck fails on checking temporary relations  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>)
Responses Re: BUG #17212: pg_amcheck fails on checking temporary relations  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>)
List pgsql-hackers

> On Oct 11, 2021, at 11:33 AM, Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie> wrote:
>
> I definitely think that it warrants a warning box. This is a huge
> practical difference.
>
> Note that I'm talking about a standard thing, which there are
> certainly a dozen or more examples of in the docs already. Just grep
> for "<warning> </warning>" tags to see the existing warning boxes.

Yes, sure, I know they exist.  It's just that I have a vague recollection of a discussion on -hackers about whether we
shouldbe using them so much. 

The documentation for contrib/amcheck has a paragraph but not a warning box.  Should that be changed also?

—
Mark Dilger
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company






pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Geoghegan
Date:
Subject: Re: BUG #17212: pg_amcheck fails on checking temporary relations
Next
From: Peter Geoghegan
Date:
Subject: Re: BUG #17212: pg_amcheck fails on checking temporary relations