Re: [Proposal] Global temporary tables - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From 曾文旌
Subject Re: [Proposal] Global temporary tables
Date
Msg-id C5442FFA-E298-42AE-8CB2-A625825E5AF0@alibaba-inc.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [Proposal] Global temporary tables  (Prabhat Sahu <prabhat.sahu@enterprisedb.com>)
Responses Re: [Proposal] Global temporary tables
List pgsql-hackers


2020年4月27日 下午5:26,Prabhat Sahu <prabhat.sahu@enterprisedb.com> 写道:

Hi Wenjing,

Please check the below scenario shows different error message with "DROP TABLE gtt;" for gtt with and without index.
-- Session1:
postgres=# create global temporary table gtt1 (c1 int);
CREATE TABLE
postgres=# create global temporary table gtt2 (c1 int);
CREATE TABLE
postgres=# create index idx2 on gtt2(c1);
CREATE INDEX

-- Session2:
postgres=# drop table gtt1;
ERROR:  can not drop relation gtt1 when other backend attached this global temp table
postgres=# drop table gtt2;
ERROR:  can not drop index gtt2 when other backend attached this global temp table.
For DROP GTT, we need to drop the index on the table first. 
So the indexes on the GTT are checked first.
But the error message needs to be fixed.
Fixed in v32


wenjing





--

With Regards,
Prabhat Kumar Sahu
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com


Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Dilip Kumar
Date:
Subject: Re: PATCH: logical_work_mem and logical streaming of largein-progress transactions
Next
From: "Jonathan S. Katz"
Date:
Subject: Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign?