Re: partitioned table and ORDER BY indexed_field DESCLIMIT 1 - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Luke Lonergan
Subject Re: partitioned table and ORDER BY indexed_field DESCLIMIT 1
Date
Msg-id C3E62232E3BCF24CBA20D72BFDCB6BF8044A24A5@MI8NYCMAIL08.Mi8.com
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: partitioned table and ORDER BY indexed_field DESCLIMIT 1  (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-performance

Works great - plans no longer sort, but rather use indices as expected.  It's in use in Greenplum now.

It's a simple approach, should easily extend from gpdb to postgres. The patch is against gpdb so someone needs to 'port' it.

- Luke

Msg is shrt cuz m on ma treo

 -----Original Message-----
From:   Simon Riggs [mailto:simon@2ndquadrant.com]
Sent:   Saturday, October 27, 2007 05:34 PM Eastern Standard Time
To:     Luke Lonergan
Cc:     Heikki Linnakangas; Anton; pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject:        Re: [PERFORM] partitioned table and ORDER BY indexed_field DESCLIMIT 1

On Sat, 2007-10-27 at 15:12 -0400, Luke Lonergan wrote:
> And I repeat - 'we fixed that and submitted a patch' - you can find it
> in the unapplied patches queue.

I got the impression it was a suggestion rather than a tested patch,
forgive me if that was wrong.

Did the patch work? Do you have timings/different plan?

--
  Simon Riggs
  2ndQuadrant  http://www.2ndQuadrant.com

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: partitioned table and ORDER BY indexed_field DESC LIMIT 1
Next
From: Pablo Alcaraz
Date:
Subject: Re: Speed difference between select ... union select ... and select from partitioned_table