Re: Fixing WAL instability in various TAP tests - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Mark Dilger
Subject Re: Fixing WAL instability in various TAP tests
Date
Msg-id C1D227C2-C271-4310-8C85-C5368C298622@enterprisedb.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Fixing WAL instability in various TAP tests  (Mark Dilger <mark.dilger@enterprisedb.com>)
Responses Re: Fixing WAL instability in various TAP tests  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers

> On Sep 25, 2021, at 11:04 AM, Mark Dilger <mark.dilger@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
>
> I took Tom's response to be, "yeah, go ahead", and am mostly waiting for the weekend to be over to see if anybody
elsehas anything to say about it. 

Here is a patch set, one patch per test.  The third patch enables its test in the Makefile, which is commented as
havingbeen disabled due to the test being unstable in the build farm.  Re-enabling the test might be wrong, since the
instabilitymight not have been due to WAL being recycled early.  I didn't find enough history about why that test was
disabled,so trying it in the build farm again is the best I can suggest.  Maybe somebody else on this list knows more? 




—
Mark Dilger
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company




Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [BUG] failed assertion in EnsurePortalSnapshotExists()
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Fixing WAL instability in various TAP tests