Re: wal_buffers - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Thomas F. O'Connell
Subject Re: wal_buffers
Date
Msg-id C140F925-0D7D-41B4-873A-6C81C0D3D307@sitening.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to wal_buffers  (Ian Westmacott <ianw@intellivid.com>)
Responses Re: wal_buffers
List pgsql-performance
On Oct 5, 2005, at 8:23 AM, Ian Westmacott wrote:

> Can anyone tell me what precisely a WAL buffer contains,
> so that I can compute an appropriate setting for
> wal_buffers (in 8.0.3)?
>
> I know the documentation suggests there is little
> evidence that supports increasing wal_buffers, but we
> are inserting a large amount of data that, I believe,
> easily exceeds the default 64K in a single transaction.
> We are also very sensitive to write latency.
>
> As background, we are doing a sustained insert of 2.2
> billion rows in 1.3 million transactions per day.  Thats
> about 1700 rows per transaction, at (roughly) 50 bytes
> per row.

Ian,

The WAL Configuration chapter (25.2) has a pretty good discussion of
how wal_buffers is used:

http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.0/static/wal-configuration.html

You might also take a look at Josh Berkus' recent testing on this
setting:

http://www.powerpostgresql.com/

--
Thomas F. O'Connell
Co-Founder, Information Architect
Sitening, LLC

Strategic Open Source: Open Your i™

http://www.sitening.com/
110 30th Avenue North, Suite 6
Nashville, TN 37203-6320
615-469-5150
615-469-5151 (fax)

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: "Steinar H. Gunderson"
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] A Better External Sort?
Next
From: Yann Michel
Date:
Subject: Re: index on custom function; explain