the columns referenced in the predicate need to reference columns whichimplement indexes to avert FTS
Anyone else?
Martin
______________________________________________
Disclaimer and confidentiality note
Everything in this e-mail and any attachments relates to the official business of Sender. This transmission is of a confidential nature and Sender does not endorse distribution to any party other than intended recipient. Sender does not necessarily endorse content contained within this transmission.
> Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 14:57:09 +0400
> From: dteslenko@gmail.com
> To: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
> Subject: [GENERAL] Strange query plan
>
> Hello!
>
> I have following table:
>
> CREATE TABLE table1 (
> field1 INTEGER NOT NULL,
> field2 INTEGER NOT NULL,
> field3 CHARACTER(30),
> ... some more numeric fields)
>
> I have also those indexes:
>
> CREATE UNIQUE INDEX idx1 ON table1 USING btree (field3, field2, field1)
> CREATE INDEX idx2 ON table1 USING btree (field1, field3)
>
> Then I query this table with something like this:
>
> SELECT SUM(...) FROM table1 WHERE field3 = 'ABC' AND field1 <> 1
> GROUP BY field2
>
> And planner picks up a sequential scan of a table. Why does he?
>
> --
> A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
> Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
> A: Top-posting.
> Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
Got Game? Win Prizes in the Windows Live Hotmail Mobile Summer Games Trivia Contest
Find out how.
