Re: logical changeset generation v6.5 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Steve Singer
Subject Re: logical changeset generation v6.5
Date
Msg-id BLU0-SMTP709117745754B11138C3AADCF90@phx.gbl
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: logical changeset generation v6.5  (Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 11/11/2013 02:06 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2013-11-10 14:45:17 -0500, Steve Singer wrote:
>
> Not really keen - that'd be a noticeable overhead. Note that in the
> cases where DEFAULT|INDEX is used, you can just use the new tuple to
> extract what you need for the pkey lookup since they now have the same
> format and since it's guaranteed that the relevant columns haven't
> changed if oldtup is null and there's a key.
>
> What are you actually doing with those columns? Populating a WHERE
> clause?

Yup building a WHERE clause

> Greetings,
>
> Andres Freund
>




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Leonardo Francalanci
Date:
Subject: Re: Fast insertion indexes: why no developments
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: The number of character limitation of custom script on pgbench