Re: patch for 9.2: enhanced errors - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Steve Singer
Subject Re: patch for 9.2: enhanced errors
Date
Msg-id BLU0-SMTP24B6091A730667AFCE6E3DAC6E0@phx.gbl
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: patch for 9.2: enhanced errors  (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Sun, 19 Jun 2011, Pavel Stehule wrote:

> Maybe there is second issue (little bit - performance - you have to
> call a output function), But I agree, so this information is very
> interesting and can help.

I am concerned about the performance impact of doing that.  Not all 
constraints are on int4 columns.  Some constraints might be on a geometry 
type that is megabytes in side taking a substantial chunk of CPU and 
bandwith to convert it into a text representation and then send it back to 
the client.



> I am open for any ideas in this direction.
>
> Regards
>
> Pavel
>
>>
>> best regards,
>> Florian Pflug
>>
>>
>



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Fujii Masao
Date:
Subject: Re: time-delayed standbys
Next
From: Noah Misch
Date:
Subject: Re: Make relation_openrv atomic wrt DDL