> On 9 Jun 2018, at 19:05, Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie> wrote:
>
> On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 11:50 AM, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se> wrote:
>> When reading the JIT developer documentation, a few small wordsmithing issues
>> stood out (although this may be due to me not being a native english speaker).
>> The attached patch fixes these to what I think the sentences inteded to say.
>
> Committed with a few adjustments.
Thanks, I’m honoured to get the first commit.
> I'm also pretty sure that Andres did in fact mean "...even for faster
> queries", since an LRU cache of JIT functions should be particularly
> useful for OLTP queries that are already individually fast enough to
> make per-execution JIT compilation overhead prohibitively expensive.
Ah, I completely misunderstood that part (apparently) but that make sense.
cheers ./daniel
