> On 15 Jan 2020, at 03:28, Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 11:21:53AM +0100, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
>> On 14 Jan 2020, at 04:54, Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
>>> Please note that OpenSSL 1.1.0 has added two routines to be able to
>>> get the min/max protocols set in a context, called
>>> SSL_CTX_get_min/max_proto_version. Thinking about older versions of
>>> OpenSSL I think that it is better to use
>>> ssl_protocol_version_to_openssl to do the parsing work. I also found
>>> that it is easier to check for compatible versions after setting both
>>> bounds in the SSL context, so as there is no need to worry about
>>> invalid values depending on the build of OpenSSL used.
>>
>> I'm not convinced that it's a good idea to check for incompatible protocol
>> range in the OpenSSL backend. We've spent a lot of energy to make the TLS code
>> library agnostic and pluggable, and since identifying a basic configuration
>> error isn't OpenSSL specific I think it should be in the guc code. That would
>> keep the layering as well as ensure that we don't mistakenly treat this
>> differently should we get a second TLS backend.
>
> Good points. And the get routines are not that portable in OpenSSL
> either even if HEAD supports 1.0.1 and newer versions... Attached is
> an updated patch which uses a GUC check for both parameters, and
> provides a hint on top of the original error message. The SSL context
> does not get reloaded if there is an error, so the errors from OpenSSL
> cannot be triggered as far as I checked (after mixing a couple of
> corrent and incorrect combinations manually).
This is pretty much exactly the patch I was intending to write for this, so +1
from me.
cheers ./daniel
