Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: update files for beta3 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Marc G. Fournier
Subject Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: update files for beta3
Date
Msg-id BC33E023ED0C9E8BDAE0171B@ganymede.hub.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: update files for beta3  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: update files for beta3  (Dave Page <dpage@postgresql.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1



- --On Friday, November 16, 2007 11:10:09 -0500 Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> 
wrote:

>  I'm really not
> too sure what the functional incompatibilities between versions are,
> but given the extent of line-by-line diffs I've seen in the output of
> even adjacent versions, this isn't a question I want to take lightly.

Just curious, but isn't that something the buildfarm would be good for? 
generate/commit a 6.1 version of configure, and see if any of hte buildfarm 
environments break ... or am I missing something 'post-install' that could be 
affected?

- ----
Marc G. Fournier           Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email . scrappy@hub.org                              MSN . scrappy@hub.org
Yahoo . yscrappy               Skype: hub.org        ICQ . 7615664
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFHPdXm4QvfyHIvDvMRAsuEAJwJ4F5yISz8wa/AR9W/b2kwgEky/ACgh015
7KGhYRO3GoyT/M/2mJn9k24=
=2/7/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_ctl -t N register ??
Next
From: Dave Page
Date:
Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: update files for beta3