Re: pg_ctl -t N register ?? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: pg_ctl -t N register ??
Date
Msg-id 200711161738.lAGHc8028867@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to pg_ctl -t N register ??  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>)
Responses Re: pg_ctl -t N register ??  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I just noticed that the "pg_ctl register" synopsis was updated to have a
> -t parameter.  This does not seem to make sense to me.  Is it correct?
> Does it do anything?
> 
> My thinking is that we should just remove the -t from that synopsis.

Well, Peter added it, but register already had the -w parameter, so
either register needs both -t and -w, or it needs neither of them.  I
don't know which is true.

--  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://postgres.enterprisedb.com
 + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: pg_ctl -t N register ??
Next
From: "Marc G. Fournier"
Date:
Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: update files for beta3